Space is limited to tell the stories, but the following headlines say a mouthful: 4/9/2017, bostonmagazine.com, “Tamerian Tzarnaev (Boston Marathon bomber): Terrorist, murderer. FBI informant?”
“3/26/2018 townhall.com, “Wait The Pulse Nightclub shooter’s father was an FBI informant (11 yrs)?; Update: FBI wanted to recruit shooter too?”
10/2/2017, washingtonexaminer. com, “Victim of ‘Draw Muhammad’ ISIS-inspired terror attack sues FBI, accuses Comey of cover-up: … an undercover FBI agent was in the car directly behind Simpson and Soofie (the 2 terrorists) when they opened fire and was even taking pictures of the car 30 seconds before the first shots were fired.
… the agent had texted Simpson just weeks before with the message, ‘Tear up Texas’.
Shortly after the first shots were fired, the agent fled, but was briefly detained by Garland police ….”
In a somewhat similar incident, an independent investigation blamed local politicians and law enforcement for the Charlottesville violence in August, 2017.
Was the violent confrontation between white supremacists and equally despicable anarchists, ANTIFA, staged to further divide America?
Then there’s the shooting in Parkland, Florida.
According to the N.Y. Post, deputies were called to the Parkland shooter’s home 39 times over a seven year period.
Why no “red flags”? Why wasn’t Nicolas Cruz under surveillance after years of disciplinary problems, being emotionally unstable and making numerous threats?
And why did the FBI fail to follow-up on two credible and detailed tips about Nicolas Cruz posting threats on social media just days before the shooting?
As with the LasVegas shooting, a lot of things don’t add up or make sense.
Could there be some grand scheme by the powers that be to allow mass shootings as a means to restrict gun ownership by law abiding citizens?
N. Rodriguez Harlingen